On
1951 she got a three-year Turner and Natwell fellowship at King’s College,
London to work under John Randall on proteins in solution and changes in their
structure when they are heated or dehydrated, causing them to denature. However
just before she arrived, Randall suddenly changed her project to the
investigation of some DNA fibers that Maurice Wilkins, also working at King’s
college with Randall. Randall wrote to
Franklin that ‘…this means that as far as the experimental X-ray effort is concerned
there will be at the moment only yourself and Gosling…’. Unfortunately, Randall
neglected to tell Wilkins about this new arrangement, even though Wilkins and
Ray Gosling had already obtained good X-ray diffraction patterns from the DNA fibers.
This set the scene for difficulties between Wilkins and Franklin which quickly
escalated over the first six months of 1951 while Franklin was building new
equipment to control the humidity of the DNA fibers using hydrogen gas bubbling
through different salts.
The
situation between Franklin and Wilkins reached such an impasse that, in October
1951, Randall directed Franklin and Gosling to work on the A (dehydrated) form
of DNA fibers from Signer and the best X-ray camera, and Wilkins to work on the
B (hydrated) form with some other fibers that did not crystallize well. Photo
51 was taken by Franklin and Gosling in May 1952 using a micro camera, and was
the clearest photo yet obtained, but it was of the B form (92% humidity) on
which they were not supposed to be working, so it was put away. The X-ray
generator was a prototype fine focus device built at Birkbeck by Werner and
Walter Spear which had been given to Wilkins and Gosling, but was then used
solely by Franklin and Gosling.
By
January 1953, Wilkins, who in turn, unknown to Franklin, showed photo 51 to James
Watson when he visited King’s from Cambridge. Watson was working there with
Francis Crick on building a model of DNA with newly obtained permission from W.
L. Brag, the head of Cavendish Laboratory.
On
the 9th February 1953, FC and JW were shown RF's December 1952 MRC Review
Committee report by Max Perutz. This report was not marked confidential, but
the results in it were unpublished. It gave the space group of the A form
DNA as face-centred monoclinic (C2), and specified
the unit-cell dimensions and angles. FC realised that this space group gave a vital clue as to the structure, because it
meant that the DNA looked the same both ways up, so that it must consist of two
antiparallel helical chains, not three chains as some had postulated. Erwin
Chargaff had already found that in DNA the number of adenines (A) + guanines
(G) was equal to the number of thymines (T) + cytosines (C), and also that the
numbers of A and T were the same, as well as the numbers of G and C. Another
critical piece of the puzzle was solved when Jerry Donohue, a postdoc who
shared an office with the model builders and was watching them at work,
suggested that the bases were the keto and not the enol forms that they had
been trying to use.By 7th March 1953, FC and JW had built a model that seemed to fit with all the known information. Each purine (A, G) was paired with a pyrimidine (T, C) across the inside of the double helix formed by two antiparallel carbon-phosphate backbones. Wilkins went to see it on 12th March and told everyone at King's about it on his return. RF was about to leave King's where she was miserable and felt she could no longer work in the same environment as Wilkins. She and Gosling had already sent off two papers on the structure of the A form and had almost finished one on the B form, of which she was very near to having the structure. How much RF ever knew about which of her results were shown to whom and when they were shown, remains a matter of current debate.
Coins in memory of Franklin |
Rosalind has received much belated posthumous recognition that sadly she did not live to witness, with at least 39 buildings or projects named after her, including the 2019 European Space Agency's ExoMars rover. Newnham College, Cambridge have named a student residential building, there is a blue plaque on the house in London where she lived from 1951 to 1958, in 2000 King's College named their new Dental Education Centre the Franklin-Wilkins Building (a painfully ironic coupling of names), and in 2018 the Rosalind Franklin Institute was launched at the Harwell Campus in Oxfordshire as an autonomous medical research centre under the joint venture of 10 universities, and funded by UK Research and Innovation. Beyond the UK, among others there is the Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science in Chicago.
In 2017, under the Planning Act of 1990, Historic England listed her tomb as of `special architectural or historic interest', with the official description (which sums up the her scientific impact very well): `the tomb commemorates the life and achievements of Rosalind Franklin, a scientist of exceptional distinction, whose pioneering work helped lay the foundations of molecular biology; Franklin's X-ray observation of DNA contributed to the discovery of its helical structure'.
Notably, last year the University of Portsmouth announced that on 2nd September it was changing the name of its James Watson Halls to Rosalind Franklin Halls. Perhaps this act shows in microcosm the growing appreciation of the impact of Franklin's life and work, somewhat redressing the balance in the previous mis-allocation of credit.
By Zavizah.
Comments
Post a Comment